CHAPTER 8:
THE FAMILIES ORGANIZE
On August 12, Eva Varga learned about Node 6A from a reporter who apologized before asking the question.
She had answered the call because the number belonged to Austin. The mission office had begun using local contractors for family support, transport and security. New numbers appeared every day.
Instead, a woman introduced herself as Asha Dwivedi from the Continental Press Service.
“Mrs. Varga, I’m sorry to contact you directly.”
Eva stood at the kitchen counter with one hand resting on the coffee machine. It had finished brewing several minutes earlier. She had not poured a cup.
“How did you get this number?”
“I won’t publish it or share it.”
“That isn’t what I asked.”
“No. I can’t identify the source.”
Eva nearly ended the call.
The reporter spoke quickly.
“I’m trying to confirm whether the families were briefed about a prelaunch thermal anomaly designated Node 6A.”
The kitchen seemed to narrow around the words.
“What anomaly?”
The reporter went silent.
Eva looked toward the wall screen. It showed the Perseus public tracker, as it had almost continuously since August 4. The ship’s white position marker had been replaced by an expanding search region. Mars Gateway and three surface vehicles were now listed beneath it as unresponsive.
“Mrs. Varga,” the reporter said, “has anyone from the program discussed Node 6A with you?”
“No.”
“Have they discussed a thermal-system concern identified during integrated testing at Lunar Gate?”
“No.”
“Or an acceptance vote connected to the June departure window?”
Eva turned off the coffee machine.
“What are you saying happened?”
“I don’t know what happened. I have two sources who say an unresolved thermal disagreement was accepted before launch with additional monitoring. One source says the records are being reviewed in connection with the loss.”
“Loss of communication.”
“Yes.”
“You said loss.”
“I’m sorry.”
“You keep saying that.”
The woman stopped.
Eva pressed the phone against her ear and looked at the dark coffee in the glass reservoir.
“Did this anomaly happen during the mission?”
“There was a sensor disagreement during the post-maneuver restart.”
“Before Elias stopped transmitting?”
“According to the last telemetry, yes.”
“Was there an alarm?”
“My understanding is no.”
“Did it damage the ship?”
“I don’t know.”
“Does anyone?”
“I don’t think so.”
Eva held the counter until the pressure in her fingers became uncomfortable.
“What are you asking me for?”
“I wanted to know whether the program informed the families before I published anything.”
“They did not.”
“May I quote you?”
“No.”
“May I say that a member of Commander Varga’s family was not briefed?”
“No.”
The reporter waited.
Eva heard traffic beyond the kitchen windows and the soft cycle of the house ventilation. Ordinary sounds. The mission liaison had called the previous evening to say there was no change in the search. The phrase had become a unit of time.
No change.
No confirmed signal.
No physical detection.
No evidence of crew action.
“Send me your questions in writing,” Eva said.
“I can do that.”
“Not your article. Your questions and the exact claims you’re trying to verify.”
“I’ll send them now.”
“And do not use my name.”
“I won’t.”
Eva ended the call.
The written message arrived less than a minute later. It contained six questions and no accusation.
Was Node 6A identified as a thermal anomaly before launch?
Did engineers recommend removal or destructive inspection?
Was the condition accepted after discussion of schedule consequences?
Did Commander Varga receive the complete dissenting assessment?
Did Node 6A show abnormal behavior during the final propulsion restart?
Have the families been informed that the issue is under review?
Eva read the questions twice.
Then she called the family liaison.
A recorded voice told her the line was experiencing unusually high volume. She entered her family authorization code and was transferred after four minutes.
“Mrs. Varga,” said Thomas Bell, the liaison assigned to Elias’s family. “I was going to contact you this morning.”
“About Node 6A?”
The pause answered before he did.
“There is a technical matter under review.”
“What is Node 6A?”
“It is part of the aft thermal-distribution system.”
“Was there a problem before launch?”
“There was a test result that received engineering review and disposition.”
“What does that mean?”
“It means the concern was examined and accepted with monitoring requirements.”
“Was it fixed?”
“The sensor cluster was replaced.”
“That wasn’t my question.”
“No verified hardware defect remained after the repeat test.”
“Was it fixed?”
Thomas spoke more carefully.
“The condition was considered safe for flight.”
“By whom?”
“The certification board.”
“Was there disagreement?”
“I don’t have the full voting record in front of me.”
“You knew I would ask about this.”
“I expected the subject might come up.”
“Because a reporter knew before I did.”
“The incident review is still establishing which information is technically relevant.”
“My son is missing. Everything that was on his ship is relevant to me.”
“I understand.”
“No, you understand the sentence. That’s different.”
Thomas did not defend himself.
Eva left the kitchen and walked into the living room. Photographs had been removed from the front windows after camera crews began waiting across the street. One still stood on the shelf beside the mission plaque: Elias at sixteen, sunburned, holding a broken bicycle chain in both hands.
“What happened during the last restart?” she asked.
“The final telemetry showed a minor sensor separation at Node 6A. It remained inside the accepted range and was decreasing.”
“And then communications stopped.”
“Yes.”
“Did anyone tell him to restart the system?”
“The restart was part of the approved flight plan.”
“Did he know the node had failed a test?”
“He had access to the accepted condition record.”
“Did he know someone wanted the whole assembly removed?”
Another pause.
“I cannot answer that from the family summary.”
“Then get the record.”
“I’ll request it.”
“Not a summary.”
“I understand.”
“I want the original recommendation, the vote, the final disposition and everything Elias was given.”
“Some materials may be restricted during the incident investigation.”
“By whom?”
“The joint mission review authority.”
“The same organizations that launched the ship?”
“The review includes multiple partners.”
“That is not what I asked.”
Thomas lowered his voice.
“No. It isn’t.”
Eva looked at the public tracker. The search region around Perseus had widened again since morning.
“Are you planning a memorial?” she asked.
“There have been preliminary discussions about a public observance.”
“Stop them.”
“I don’t control that process.”
“Then tell whoever does that Elias is missing. He is not available for a memorial.”
“The families will be consulted before any event.”
“Consulted the way we were consulted about Node 6A?”
Thomas was silent.
Eva closed her eyes.
She did not want to hurt him. He had called every day. He had answered questions when answers existed and remained on the line when they did not. He was not responsible for the ship, the review board or the reporter.
He was simply the voice placed between the institution and the people it had failed to prepare.
“I’m sorry,” she said.
“You don’t need to apologize.”
“Yes, I do. You’re the only person who still answers.”
“I’ll get what I can.”
Eva thanked him and ended the call.
She opened the secure family portal.
A new message waited at the top.
TECHNICAL REVIEW NOTICE
The Joint Perseus Incident Review has identified preflight and in-flight engineering records requiring additional analysis. No reviewed condition has been established as causal. Families will receive verified findings before public release whenever operationally possible.
The message did not mention Node 6A.
Beneath it, a support notice offered individual counseling, legal guidance and assistance managing media requests.
Eva ignored all three.
She opened the family discussion page.
Thirty-seven new messages had been posted in forty minutes.
The first read:
HAS ANYONE ELSE BEEN CALLED ABOUT NODE 6A?
Leave a comment for the author
Your comment is private when submitted. NDJ Productions may select comments for public display.